Poll: Should President Barack Hussein Obama II Meet With HIM Yao Sui, China’s Current Succession Emperor And Head Of State In Exile? (see page for the exact wording)
Obama / Clinton on meeting anti-US leaders
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3Oj7Jn9rv4
(23-Jul-2007) SC Democratic Debate
A. Question by Stephen Sorta
Diamond Bar, Calif
“In 1982 Anwar Sadat traveled to Israel, a trip that has resulted in a peace agreement that has lasted ever since. In the spirit of that type of bold leadership would you be willing to meet, separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration in Washington DC or anywhere else, with leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?”
B. My Poll Question
“Should President Barack Hussein Obama II, without pre-conditions, in his first year in office, meet with HIM Yao Sui, China’s current succession Emperor and head of state in exile (the man who successfully negotiated an end to the Iraq War between President George H.W. Bush and President Saddam Hussein in 1990), in Washington DC or anywhere else, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?”
–
Political courtesy demands that our President acknowledge and treat with all consideration and kindness foreign heads of state. No matter what system of governance, whether communist, capitalist, democracy, dictatorship, or nobility, all heads of state should be accorded the respect due them.
One can take the posture that we lead so we don’t have to kowtow to a foreign and barbaric (uncivilized and un-Christian) world power or that we live in a modern day era where nations have evolved and that it is to our best interest to make friends.
In order to gain a nation’s cooperation, you either are friends with that nation or you coerce them into doing your will. Which do you think is the better in today’s modern day nuclear age?
What a man learns in your country, what he personally experiences, he will take those memories back home with him and the degree of cooperation that we can expect from his nation will be dependent upon how we have treated that man. Big dividends sometimes comes from random acts or even small acts of kindness.
Meeting people is the best way towards good diplomacy. What matters for this poll or survey question, though, is what does the majority of America think.
watchmansclapper
Watchman's Clapper Blog 
QUESTION: “Should President Barack Hussein Obama II, without pre-conditions, in his first year in office, meet with HIM Yao Sui, China’s current succession Emperor and head of state in exile (the man who successfully negotiated an end to the Iraq War between President George H.W. Bush and President Saddam Hussein in 1990), in Washington DC or anywhere else, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?”
1. American people need to be more aware of what is going on in their nation as well as in the world. Having a reluctance to deal with truth and with God’s standards of righteousness will doom their nation. Perhaps, Americans do not care about God or about true justice.
2. No matter what any man says about Barack Obama. No matter what they say of him, he still has an obligation to meet with people as the 44th US President. Major crisis are solved by a meeting of the minds or through negotiation. In the video, Obama chides the Bush administration for not meeting with the US’s worst enemies. Yet Obama refuses to meet with me, the man who could single-handedly end the Iraq War.
3. If 10 US soldiers die, will Obama meet with me? If 100 US soldiers die, will Obama meet with me? If 1,000 US soldiers die, will President Obama, now, meet with me? What does it take for this fraud to fulfill his sworn oath and defend our nation and end this illegal war? Would Obama meet with me, when 10,000 troops have died? Obama is not legally our US President and would he rather see 100,000 troops die, than to admit to his legal place of birth and dual citizenship? (http://obamacrimes.com)
With the right negotiator in place it is possible to immediately end the Iraq War. Don’t let Washington fool you. And the Press should/should have published the full truth of this Iraq War. The truth has not as of yet been published, though it is well known in Congress and the Pentagon (including among US military Generals). If God should die and our nation, via the above-mentioned agencies, had a change of heart, a true repentant heart, they could bring about a solution, a permanent good and upright solution as measured by God’s standards, which will be satisfactory to all and this war could end tomorrow if our nation wanted.
Should Americans be blind or should they insist that our nation’s newsmedia organizations (over 800 of them) publish the real truth behind this illegal and heinous/murderous war?
4. Barack Obama aka: Barry Soetoro (his legal name), aka: Barack Hussein Obama II (name on fraudulently secured Hawaii COLB, secured (finagled) by Madelyn L. Dunham, Stanley Ann’s mother, in Hawaii), the name that appears on his actual Kenyan birth certificate secured (finagled) by Stanley Ann Dunham, aka: Barry Soetoro (his name on his Indonesian school records and Indonesian passport), even if he is not legally our 44th US President (being born in Kenya and a dual citizen), he would do well by meeting with China’s Emperor, the man who President George H.W. Bush had allowed to negotiate with Saddam Hussein for his agreement to withdraw from Kuwait. To secure such powerful people on one’s side lends credibility to his presidency and allows President Obama an excuse as to why he should go against the majority (Bush administration, Democrat and Republican Congress), make known the real truths behind this illegal war, and bring it to a final close.
This is what a good reformer should and ought to do to fulfill his presidency, restore order to this planet and to our nation. It is not merely our beleaguering economy that he must deal with and our nation’s health care, but large and permanently looming international issues of continual terrorism and two major illegally fought wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, in a nuclear age. Why be a coward, when solutions are possible? Why do a half-horse job, when a complete solution is possible?
Should he meet with China’s Emperor? The answer is absolutely YES! There can be no other answer for our nation.